Reut Sade Law Office

Reut Sade Law Office is a boutique law firm specializing in family and inheritance law. The firm has extensive experience in representing parties in divorce proceedings in the rabbinical courts and in courts regard-ing family law and inheritance matters, including disputes between spouses, spousal and child sup-port, Ktubah claims, division of parental responsibility, domestic violence, division of property, in-cluding liquidation, sharing and balancing resources in career assets, reputation and earnings gaps, drawing up pre-nuptial financial agreements, cohabitation agreements, divorce agreements, inher-itances, wills and estates including objections to the execution of wills, among others.
The firm represents in all relevant legal courts, including family, district and Supreme Court, in rabbinical courts nation-wide and in the Great Rabbinic Court in Jerusalem, and support in mediation proceedings and negotiations regarding personal status.

Representing Hundreds of Clients, Some of Whom Have Complex and Difficult Cases

The firm was established in 2010, and hundreds of client cases have been represented over the years, a significant part of which concerned complex cases that entailed creative solutions and strategies to fully protected its clients’ monetary and reputational interests. The firm covers all areas of personal status, including representation in divorce proceedings in the rabbinic courts and family courts regarding personal status matters.

Attorney Reut Sade, Owner

The office is headed by Adv. Reut Sade. Growing up in Yavne, she was taught the fundamental values of striving for excel-lence, caring, helping and appreciating others. As of her military service, Adv. Sade did her best to implement these prin-ciples, serving as a combat paramedic and clinic manager in an elite unit (Shaldag), in officer’s course and as an Air Force officer.
Alongside her academic studies, Adv. Sade served as a parliamentary assistant to Knesset member Naomi Blumenthal (the youngest at the time), and as a spokesperson for the National Student Organization. As a lawyer, she is an active representative in the Bar Association’s committees, among them the Ethics Committee of the Central District.

Completion of a Doctorate in Economics

Adv. Sade advanced her professional abilities, both at the academic level by completing a doctorate in Economics and at the practical level, through participation in professional courses (mediation course, arbitration training, Lasting power of at-torney, notary course, directors course). She specialized in a leading law firm and opened an independent office in the field of family and inheritance law.

Attorney Sade Leads in every Case

Every case in the firm is accompanied by attorney Sade and the staff, who have accumulated years of combined experience and formulate a strategy tailored to each client’s needs while exercising creative thinking and standing firm on the rights and interests of the clients to achieve optimal results.
The firm collaborates with a wide range of first-class professionals, including accountants, actuaries, economists, private investigators, appraisers, etc, who enable the firm to reach the truth.

Selected Cases

Postponement of Alimony Payment Due to an Unstable Financial Situation - A client was sued by his ex-wife for alimony for their minor son, despite sharing joint parental responsibility and even though the mother’s income exceeds the father’s income. The mother’s claim was rejected. The client was not required to pay alimony due to the income ratio between the parties and the equal distribution of parenting time.
Child Alimony Payment by a Father Who Failed to Support his Minor Son - A woman, our client, gave birth to a joint child with her ex-partner, who did not acknowledge his child’s paternity and did not pay his needs and alimony. A tissue test was conducted in which it was determined that the ex-spouse was the bio-logical father, and the court rejected his claims and ordered him to provide for the child. Rejection of a Claim for Additional Compensation after.
Closing on an Agreement - A client who owns a commercial company with an annual turnover of tens of millions of NIS was represented in a divorce case brought by his wife. The couple reached a comprehensive agreement through the firm, according to which the wife receives real estate assets worth NIS11.5 million and a cash payment of NIS5 million. The wife filed a new claim to receive additional rights in properties purchased after separation. The court rejected the lawsuit because the agreement had been previously agreed upon and approved by the court.
Objection to the will - The children of their late mother (out of her 9 children) objected via the office to the third will of the deceased, who left all her property to the brother of the opponents, despite not including him in her two previous wills. An objection was sub-mitted in which the opponents claimed that the deceased signed her last will under the unfair influence of their brother and as a result of his active and improper involvement in the procedures and steps that caused the deceased to sign the will.
After a lengthy evidentiary hearing and the submission of summaries, the court accepted the objection of the firm’s cli-ents. It was determined that, indeed, the brother who was the main beneficiary of the last will had exerted an unfair in-fluence on his mother and was also improperly involved in drafting the will in his favor.
The Children Stayed with the Father, the Mother Will Pay Alimony - The office filed an extraordinary alimony claim on behalf of a father who claimed that he needed help financing the children’s expenses since they both live with him. He stated that he earns only 6,100 NIS a month and has to deal with bankruptcy proceedings in which he pays 5,000 NIS a month and a rent of 3,600 NIS. As part of the lawsuit, temporary alimony in the amount of 1,200 NIS for two children over the age of 6 was awarded in favor of the father. It was also determined that the mother would participate in half of the medical expenses, not covered by the health insurance fund. In addition, she will bear half of the financing of private lessons and classes.
The Mother Objected, but the Child Would Move to a School Near His Father’s Residence - The office filed a custody claim on behalf of a father who requested that his son moves in with him, and the claim was accepted in full. Later, the office submitted another request on behalf of the father to integrate the child into an educa-tional institution in the city where he currently lives. The father stated that the child is interested in moving and strives to strengthen his social ties with children his age who live near him. He also wants to avoid traveling to the current school located in the city where his mother lives. Despite the mother’s objection, the court ruled that the move was in the mi-nor’s best interest and that leaving him at the previous school would waste time and energy.